What star naming services actually sell you
Star naming services — International Star Registry, Star Registry, Name a Star Live, Staracle, and dozens of others — offer essentially the same product: you choose a star from their catalog, submit a name, pay a fee (typically $20–$100), and receive a printed certificate and a star chart showing the star's location.
The certificate looks official. It has seals, signatures, coordinates. The star chart shows a real portion of the sky. The name you chose is registered in the company's private database.
None of this is technically fraudulent. The companies are transparent — usually in the fine print — that their registries are private and unofficial. The certificate documents a real transaction. The star chart shows a real star.
The problem is the gap between what the marketing implies and what the product actually delivers. The phrase "name a star" suggests a permanent, recognized act. Most buyers — and the people who receive these as gifts — reasonably expect the name to mean something beyond the company's own records.
It doesn't.
The certificate looks official. It has seals, signatures, coordinates. The star chart shows a real portion of the sky. The name you chose is registered in the company's private database.
None of this is technically fraudulent. The companies are transparent — usually in the fine print — that their registries are private and unofficial. The certificate documents a real transaction. The star chart shows a real star.
The problem is the gap between what the marketing implies and what the product actually delivers. The phrase "name a star" suggests a permanent, recognized act. Most buyers — and the people who receive these as gifts — reasonably expect the name to mean something beyond the company's own records.
It doesn't.
The IAU's position — and why it matters
The International Astronomical Union (IAU) was founded in 1919 and is the internationally recognized authority for naming celestial objects. Their Working Group on Star Names (WGSN) manages official stellar nomenclature and maintains the list of officially recognized proper names for stars.
Their position on commercial star naming is unambiguous. From the IAU's official website:
"Although we appreciate that these services are of sentimental value to their customers, such 'names' have no formal or official validity whatsoever. Similar 'commercial' schemes to name Moon craters, Martian craters, etc., are similarly unofficial. Plots of land on the Moon are also for sale — but, again, only within the framework of the vendor's own private system."
The IAU uses thousands of properly named stars in their work — names like Sirius, Betelgeuse, Vega, Polaris. None of these came from a commercial registry. They come from historical astronomical tradition, formalized by the WGSN.
When a company "names" a star "after" your grandmother, that name is not used by any astronomer. It is not in any scientific database. It does not appear in any observatory's records. No planetarium will ever display it. It exists only in the company's spreadsheet.
Their position on commercial star naming is unambiguous. From the IAU's official website:
"Although we appreciate that these services are of sentimental value to their customers, such 'names' have no formal or official validity whatsoever. Similar 'commercial' schemes to name Moon craters, Martian craters, etc., are similarly unofficial. Plots of land on the Moon are also for sale — but, again, only within the framework of the vendor's own private system."
The IAU uses thousands of properly named stars in their work — names like Sirius, Betelgeuse, Vega, Polaris. None of these came from a commercial registry. They come from historical astronomical tradition, formalized by the WGSN.
When a company "names" a star "after" your grandmother, that name is not used by any astronomer. It is not in any scientific database. It does not appear in any observatory's records. No planetarium will ever display it. It exists only in the company's spreadsheet.
The multiple-ownership problem
Here is the issue that exposes the deepest flaw in commercial star naming: there is no coordination between the registries.
International Star Registry and Star Registry are different companies. Both have been selling star names for decades. Both maintain their own private databases. Neither coordinates with the other.
This means the same star can appear in both companies' databases under completely different names. Someone may have "named" a given star for their grandmother in 2008 through International Star Registry. Another person may have "named" the same star for their wedding anniversary in 2015 through Name a Star Live.
Both hold certificates. Both paid real money. Both names are "registered." Neither name means anything, and neither person has any claim over the other.
The official IAU names — Betelgeuse, Polaris, Vega — are unique. There is one Betelgeuse. Commercial star names are not unique in any meaningful sense. They're entries in private databases with no enforcement, no exclusivity, and no external recognition.
International Star Registry and Star Registry are different companies. Both have been selling star names for decades. Both maintain their own private databases. Neither coordinates with the other.
This means the same star can appear in both companies' databases under completely different names. Someone may have "named" a given star for their grandmother in 2008 through International Star Registry. Another person may have "named" the same star for their wedding anniversary in 2015 through Name a Star Live.
Both hold certificates. Both paid real money. Both names are "registered." Neither name means anything, and neither person has any claim over the other.
The official IAU names — Betelgeuse, Polaris, Vega — are unique. There is one Betelgeuse. Commercial star names are not unique in any meaningful sense. They're entries in private databases with no enforcement, no exclusivity, and no external recognition.
What happens when the company closes?
Commercial star naming services are businesses. Businesses close.
Several star naming companies have shut down over the years. When they do, the database of names they maintained disappears with them. The certificates people paid for are still technically valid — in the sense that they document a purchase that occurred — but the "registration" they reference no longer exists anywhere.
This is fundamentally different from official astronomical nomenclature. When the IAU names a star Vega, that name persists in scientific literature, astronomical databases, and public record indefinitely. It doesn't depend on any single company's continued operation.
A name in a private commercial database is only as permanent as the database itself. A radio signal in space is governed by physics, not business continuity. The signal from Cosmic Echo has been traveling since transmission — and will keep traveling whether Cosmic Echo exists or not.
Several star naming companies have shut down over the years. When they do, the database of names they maintained disappears with them. The certificates people paid for are still technically valid — in the sense that they document a purchase that occurred — but the "registration" they reference no longer exists anywhere.
This is fundamentally different from official astronomical nomenclature. When the IAU names a star Vega, that name persists in scientific literature, astronomical databases, and public record indefinitely. It doesn't depend on any single company's continued operation.
A name in a private commercial database is only as permanent as the database itself. A radio signal in space is governed by physics, not business continuity. The signal from Cosmic Echo has been traveling since transmission — and will keep traveling whether Cosmic Echo exists or not.
Why do people feel misled?
The market for star naming is large — estimated at tens of millions of dollars annually. The services have sold millions of certificates. They advertise heavily around gift-giving occasions: Valentine's Day, anniversaries, memorials, birthdays.
The emotional appeal is genuine. Naming something after someone you love — a child, a partner, a parent who has passed — is a meaningful impulse. The stars are ancient, beautiful, and permanent. The marketing leans heavily into this.
The disappointment comes when buyers — or recipients — eventually learn the truth. A common pattern: someone receives a star naming certificate as a gift, shows it to a friend who works in astronomy or just googles it out of curiosity, and discovers the IAU's position. The certificate doesn't feel diminished — it feels like a fraud, even if the company technically disclosed the limitations in the fine print.
Search "is naming a star real" or "name a star scam" and you'll find years of this exact experience: "I gave this as a gift and I feel terrible." "I wish someone had told me before I spent $80." "I thought it was official."
This disappointment is the market Cosmic Echo was built to serve: people who love the concept of connecting someone to the stars, but want to give something that is genuinely, physically, permanently real.
The emotional appeal is genuine. Naming something after someone you love — a child, a partner, a parent who has passed — is a meaningful impulse. The stars are ancient, beautiful, and permanent. The marketing leans heavily into this.
The disappointment comes when buyers — or recipients — eventually learn the truth. A common pattern: someone receives a star naming certificate as a gift, shows it to a friend who works in astronomy or just googles it out of curiosity, and discovers the IAU's position. The certificate doesn't feel diminished — it feels like a fraud, even if the company technically disclosed the limitations in the fine print.
Search "is naming a star real" or "name a star scam" and you'll find years of this exact experience: "I gave this as a gift and I feel terrible." "I wish someone had told me before I spent $80." "I thought it was official."
This disappointment is the market Cosmic Echo was built to serve: people who love the concept of connecting someone to the stars, but want to give something that is genuinely, physically, permanently real.
What actually-permanent alternatives exist
If you want to give someone a connection to the stars that doesn't depend on a private database, there are a few real options:
A real radio transmission (Cosmic Echo) — Your personal message is encoded into binary and transmitted as an actual radio signal at 1420 MHz from a parabolic dish, aimed at the star of your choice. The signal travels at the speed of light. It doesn't depend on any database. It will continue propagating through space regardless of what happens to any company. The certificate documents a physical event — not a database entry. Starting at $19, with a full comparison to star naming services here.
Memorial spaceflight (Celestis, Elysium Space) — Companies that physically launch a small capsule containing cremated remains into orbit or deep space. Genuinely physical. Significantly more expensive ($3,000–$13,000).
Adopt a star through a research institution — Some legitimate observatories and planetariums offer adoption programs that fund real research. The name isn't used scientifically but the funding is real and the program has institutional backing.
Dedicate a minor planet through the IAU — The IAU does allow individuals to suggest names for minor planets and asteroids through a formal nomination process — but this is restricted to significant scientific contributors or nominees selected by discoverers. Not a commercial product.
Of these, a Cosmic Echo transmission is the only option that is physically real, personally meaningful, verifiable, and priced comparably to star naming packages. The signal exists in space. The certificate proves it. The tracker shows it moving. Nothing about it depends on a company maintaining a spreadsheet.
A real radio transmission (Cosmic Echo) — Your personal message is encoded into binary and transmitted as an actual radio signal at 1420 MHz from a parabolic dish, aimed at the star of your choice. The signal travels at the speed of light. It doesn't depend on any database. It will continue propagating through space regardless of what happens to any company. The certificate documents a physical event — not a database entry. Starting at $19, with a full comparison to star naming services here.
Memorial spaceflight (Celestis, Elysium Space) — Companies that physically launch a small capsule containing cremated remains into orbit or deep space. Genuinely physical. Significantly more expensive ($3,000–$13,000).
Adopt a star through a research institution — Some legitimate observatories and planetariums offer adoption programs that fund real research. The name isn't used scientifically but the funding is real and the program has institutional backing.
Dedicate a minor planet through the IAU — The IAU does allow individuals to suggest names for minor planets and asteroids through a formal nomination process — but this is restricted to significant scientific contributors or nominees selected by discoverers. Not a commercial product.
Of these, a Cosmic Echo transmission is the only option that is physically real, personally meaningful, verifiable, and priced comparably to star naming packages. The signal exists in space. The certificate proves it. The tracker shows it moving. Nothing about it depends on a company maintaining a spreadsheet.
~6 hours
Time to transmission
1420 MHz
Hydrogen line frequency
299,792 km/s
Signal speed
$19
Founders price until Jun 1
Frequently Asked Questions
Everything you need to know
Your words deserve to travel forever
Founders price $19 for everyone until June 1, 2026. Your message transmits within hours.
Send Your Message